I took a late flight tonight to Dallas and was transfixed by an article in page D1 of the August 23, 2007 issue of the Wall Street Journal by the “Moving On” columnist Jeff Zaslow (here for a fee http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118782905698506010.html?mod=todays_us_personal_journal) that was as amazing in it’s exposure of the outcome of a frankly common practice of excluding men in the lives of children.
Look at this:
![[photo]](http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AK807_pjMOVI_20070822174330.gif)
Now what if that same ad (by the Virginia Department of Health) were placed around your church? Is it overboard? Does it create a deeply one-sided sense of safety at the expense of balance? We don’t allow men to change babies diapers in our nurseries and Zaslow states that airlines do not sit unaccompanied minors next to men.
In Michigan, the North Macomb Soccer Club has a policy that at least one female parent must always sit on the sidelines, to guard against any untoward behavior by male coaches. In Churchville, Pa., soccer coach Barry Pflueger says young girls often want a hug after scoring a goal, but he refrains. Even when girls are injured, “you must comfort them without touching them, a very difficult thing to do,” he says. “It saddens me that this is what we’ve come to.”
TV shows, including the Dateline NBC series “To Catch a Predator,” hype stories about male abusers. Now social-service agencies are also using controversial tactics to spread the word about abuse. This summer, Virginia’s Department of Health mounted an ad campaign for its sex-abuse hotline. Billboards featured photos of a man holding a child’s hand. The caption: “It doesn’t feel right when I see them together.”
More than 200 men emailed complaints about the campaign to the health department. “The implication is that if you see a man holding a girl’s hand, he’s probably a predator,” says Marc Rudov, who runs the fathers’ rights site TheNoNonsenseMan.com. “In other words, if you see a father out with his daughter, call the police.”
“The number of men who will hurt a child is tiny compared to the population,” says Benjamin Radford, who researches statistics on predators and is managing editor of the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer. “Virtually all of the time, if a child is lost or in trouble, he will be safe going to the nearest male stranger.”
What do you think? We read this past week that Blacks are more than 60% of all murder victims in the US so this same logic would try to eliminate guns for this population sub group.
Child-welfare groups say these are necessary precautions, given that most predators are male. But fathers’ rights activists and educators now argue that an inflated predator panic is damaging men’s relationships with kids. Some men are opting not to get involved with children at all, which partly explains why many youth groups can’t find male leaders, and why just 9% of elementary-school teachers are male, down from 18% in 1981.
What do you think?