Golden Compass FAQ
Here’s a Golden Compass FAQ that I wrote for my own congregation. The content is below. Feel free to download and distribute the pdf though.
Here’s an FAQ that I wrote for families in my congregation. I prefer Keith’s suggestion of a dicussion board. Unfortunately our family message board isn’t scheduled to go online for a few months.
Is the Golden Compass Movie anti-God?
Not anymore. Philip Pullman’s Trilogy, His Dark Materials, takes a decidedly negative tone toward organized religion. However, New Line Cinema, became aware of the books’ plotline and demanded a re-write. The studio invested $180 Million into making The Golden Compass and couldn’t risk a boycott. The antagonist in the movie is not longer “the Church” or a senile God, but a totalitarian government.
So the author of the books, Phillip Pullman, is anti-God?
That’s not a fair statement. If you kick around his website, Pullman seems to place value in religious experience. I can’t tell from his writing if he believes that there is a supernatural power on the other side of our religious experiences or not. What is obvious is that Pullman believes that there is a great limit to what we can know about God. So it is fairer to categorize Pullman as an agnostic– an agnostic who has a strong dislike for the Christian faith.
A quick read through Pullman’s website reveals his strong disdain for how religions, such as Christianity, are configured. His convictions about how little we can know about God cause him to view Christian theology and moral judgments as arbitrary and man-made. He views the clergy as agents of control and opponents of human freedom. He seems to rail against Christianity the most, but probably because it’s the dominant religion in Western Cultures.
Do the books have demonic themes? Didn’t he write these books as a response to the The Chronicles of Narnia?
No. There are fictional creatures in the books called daemons. The “daemon” is a character out of Greek mythology and shouldn’t be confused with the demons of the Bible. In Greek mythology a daemon can be good or bad. In Pullman’s world, a daemon is a creature that bonds with a human and serves as their assistant or guide.
Pullman is open about his dislike for the Narnia books. He’s repeatedly called them “poison.” He claims the books are misogynistic. I suspect his biggest objection is that C.S. Lewis communicated the Christian story so well in these books. Regardless, is not a sin to dislike C.S. Lewis.
Milton’s Paradise Lost is actually the work that inspired His Dark Materials (“His dark materials” is a phrase from Milton’s poem). In Paradise Lost sin enters the world when Adam and Eve give into temptation and bite the apple. Pullman turns the story on its head and casts the eating of forbidden fruit as a good thing—the key to gaining more wisdom.
The Christian reader will turn his or her mind to Genesis 3 and see that Pullman is echoing same logic offered by the serpent.
Shouldn’t our church organize itself to boycott the movie?
I’m sure you’ve noticed that Grace hasn’t boycotted anything. That’s because boycotts tend to shutdown meaningful conversations between parties. Grace’s bias is toward starting conversations with unchurched people. (Not to shill my books, but I do have a chapter on this topic in my latest book Divine Intention: How God’s Work in the Early Church Empowers Us Today.)
Boycotting the “Golden Compass” would be particularly confusing to bystanders since all the anti-religion themes have been purged the movie.
Should I let my child see the movie or read the books?
Grace doesn’t intend to make that decision for you. My hunch is that reworked movie will be harmless fun. As a dad, I wouldn’t let my elementary aged son read the book. I personally wonder if elementary school aged children are able to tell the difference between an attack on God and a critique of organized religion.
Now I might actually recommend that a parent read the books with his or her middle- or high-school aged children. This could be a positive and fun way for a teenager to explore beliefs that run counter to Christianity. As a parent, you’d have a new opportunity to answer your child’s questions about faith.
Have you read the books, Larry?
I’m nearly finished with “The Golden Compass.” I’ve already shared my concerns about the books. Here’s what I appreciate. Lyra, the protagonist, is a strong female character. There aren’t enough of these in children’s literature, I think. And even though I believe Pullman goes too far in his opposition to organized religion, I like his hostility toward religion as a form of control. Some of the Old Testament Prophets, such as Samuel and Malachi, made similar attacks when the clergy used their power to exploit people.
Kudos, Larry. Well thought out, respectful, and non fearful. I don’t know if I completely agree with you that elementary aged children are unable to understand the differences between criticism of God and criticism of religion. No, I wouldn’t hand the book to a child and let them read it on their own, but I do think that if a parent were to read it with their child and guide their child through the worldview it is possible for older elementary children to be stretched. I think that if we wait until junior high or high school to present our children with material like this is too late. I also think that older elementary aged children would benefit from the literary value of the book.
Where would I draw the line? I hesitate to say, but I think a mature 8 or 9 year old could read through the first book with a parent who has made a habit of intentionally teaching and guiding his/her children could gain a lot from it. The subsequent books would be more for 10 and older. For a parent that is just starting intentionally using everyday moments to teach and guide his/her children, I would probably wait until closer to 10 to read the books.
I would probably hold the same for the movie. It is rated PG-13.
Good catch on the PG-13, Henry. I was strictly looking at theological content. Althought, not all PG-13’s are crated equal.
I completely agree with you that not all PG-13s are created equal. It is something that parents do need to be made aware of, though, in their decision-making process.
I’m Very disappointed that we have to find something worthwhile in this movie, like a ” strong, female character,” to make this movie seem worth watching. The comments the author makes about C.S. Lewis’s Narnia series are enough to make me sure Pullman has no good thing for Christian children to hear(or see). The MTV movie site had many negative things about the movie, while the Christian sites seem ambivalent! This material is UNNECSSARY for our impressionable children. One Christian website said it would be okay for Christian kids if their parents would dialogue with them about the movie. I work with children daily, and parents are more absent than ever. The kids will go to the movie, then, perhaps, read the books. Go to the MTV website (be careful),and see their quotes by Pullman–they should concern you!
Pastor Joe,
You’re missing the point. We aren’t endorsing the movies OR the books. We’re advocating a Christian reponse that isn’t fear driven– a response that looks for ways to engage culture and build a dialogue.
I’m concerned by your statement that since all the anti God stuff has been removed, “My hunch is that reworked movie will be harmless fun.” Should Christians settle for “harmless fun” as their standard? When we realize that kids are forming their basic world view by what they see and do for entertainment then why would we not hold up the highest possible standards for them to build off of?
I also question whether we should think it necessary to present our teens opposing views. The culture will do that for us. Our job is to teach them the reasons why we do and believe the way we do so that when they are confronted they’ll be able to answer. There are too many deceptions out there for us to chase them all down and explain them to our kids. What we can to is give logical, well thought out arguments for truth which will serve as a vaccination against false doctrine.
Couple things, Steve…
First, Jeffrey Overstreet has seen the film and is not impressed that the anti-religion themes have been sufficiently softened. That’s new info.
Secondly, I agree that teaching doctrine matters. With teens, using a book series like His Dark Materials, could be a way to help teens cut their teeth on applying doctrine to contradictory world views.
Look, I just saw the movie. There was no mention of battling against a god or anything. More or less, an orinization wished to keep the truth to themselves. True, in the books its blanent about a god being behind a war. But the movie is harmless to over zealous Christians that allow everything to affend them
Thanks, Nell. I will be viewing the movie tomorrow.
Thank you, this is an interesting take on the the movie. I’ve been reading up on the motivation behind this book because of the sharp criticism I’ve received from having gone to see the movie. It seems to me that the hateful reaction to this movie is mostly hype. I don’t understand how a claimed atheist could possibly be anti-God. If you believe something doesn’t exist, then your opinion of that thing is no longer relevant to anyone or anything (including yourself).
Maybe I’m simplifying this to much.
Alexander,
I think Pullman is anti-church, specifically anti-Catholic, more than he is anti-God. Pullman gets angry at any group that speaks with confidence and about a being that he is not sure exists or is knowable.
Those themes were largely edited out of the movie.
Sorry for those reactions you received.